Document 1810 DOCN M94A1810 TI Problems with communication between a specialist HIV unit and primary care. DT 9412 AU Guthrie B; Barton S; Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. SO Int Conf AIDS. 1994 Aug 7-12;10(1):446 (abstract no. PD0391). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ICA10/94370765 AB OBJECTIVE: To assess communication between a specialist HIV unit in London, UK and general practitioners (GPs). METHOD: 1. 213 patients who had attended HIV outpatients in August 1993 had given written permission for their GP to be written to. The notes of 206 (96.7%) of them were inspected for evidence of letters written to their GP. 2. The general practice notes of 48 patients in four general practices were inspected to count consultation rates and communication from the hospital during 1993. RESULTS: 1. 66.5% and 44.2% of patients had not had a letter written in the last 3 months and the last year respectively. There was no difference between patients with AIDS and those without. Only 30% of GPs were informed within one month about a first AIDS diagnosis and only 22% within one month of a first CMV retinitis diagnosis. 2. The 48 patients had been seen by their GPs 150 times in the first ten months of 1993 with a mean consultation rate since registration of 3.9 contacts per year. The GPs had received no letters in 1993 on 27/48 (56%) patients and had received discharge summaries for only 9/34 (26%) of these patients' admissions to hospital in 1993. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK HIV services have largely evolved from genitourinary medicine where there is a tradition of total confidentiality. Increasingly though, care for patients with HIV has moved into the community and HIV services must adapt to this by changing the way they relate to community health services. This audit has led to the development of strategies to improve communication, examples of which will be presented in the context of the maintenance of patient confidentiality and choice. DE *Communication *Family Practice *Hospitals Human *HIV Infections *Interprofessional Relations London MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).